grupak
08-15 10:36 AM
I have a question regarding employment and I-485 approval. For travel, one can take the I-797 approval notice and get their passport stamped if the physical green card has not arrived yet.
How about employment? Can the approved I-797 for green card be used for filling in I-9 for employment? One can think of various situations where this might be useful. Say you have renewed your EAD/H1B that is expiring, do you file the new I-9 with new EAD/H1B or show the I-797.
How about employment? Can the approved I-797 for green card be used for filling in I-9 for employment? One can think of various situations where this might be useful. Say you have renewed your EAD/H1B that is expiring, do you file the new I-9 with new EAD/H1B or show the I-797.
wallpaper gold mat star on lack
sunnymit
02-22 11:05 AM
Ok. That makes sense. I will contact the HQ and try to find out the solution. Calling the local SS office doesn't help as the first thing their automated system asks for is SS# for you to move on!
sanagani
03-25 06:24 PM
I have moved to san jose using AC21 last year but still have the address of my aunt in los angeles as they own a house , so that i do not have to go thru address change hassle, it is okay or do i have to provide my address
2011 The shoe lace is lack too.
pappu
07-20 02:20 PM
:D Send it to Jay Leno for Monday Night News. You can black out any personal information
Good Idea :)
Send it to all late night comedy shows with a brief note explaining all the hassles of legal green card process. This example being one!!
Good Idea :)
Send it to all late night comedy shows with a brief note explaining all the hassles of legal green card process. This example being one!!
more...
vts31
10-01 10:26 PM
wacom gives u more for your money. Genius feels really fragile...likes its gonna break easy.
kode
10-23 07:20 PM
love the idea!
I have a few files that I never used.. maybe someone would like them.
I have a few files that I never used.. maybe someone would like them.
more...
pdakwala
05-27 02:11 PM
Hey Folks,
I want to talk to an individual who is stuck at the Backlog elemination center. I am in touch with the reporter who is working on the story for the people who are stuck at BEC.
The topic is how would the current bill debated in the senate would affect people who are stuck at the labor process and their application is stuck at the BEC.
This is very urgent so please call me at 408 204 2200 if you are living in bay area. Please call me directly. DO NOT SENT ME A PM.
I want to talk to an individual who is stuck at the Backlog elemination center. I am in touch with the reporter who is working on the story for the people who are stuck at BEC.
The topic is how would the current bill debated in the senate would affect people who are stuck at the labor process and their application is stuck at the BEC.
This is very urgent so please call me at 408 204 2200 if you are living in bay area. Please call me directly. DO NOT SENT ME A PM.
2010 Next to that is a gold star on
a_yaja
07-24 02:56 PM
I mean should it be only Software engr in the exp letter rather than Sr Software engr, since the labor says Software engr ?
What is the position mentioned in the LC for your previous job? IMHO, it does not matter what the title is. As long as the job description is the same, you should be OK.
I had "part time Oracle developer" in the LC but the letter I got just said "Oracle developer" and mentioned that is was part time (20 hrs/ wk). I don't think it is such a big deal.
What did your lawyer say?
What is the position mentioned in the LC for your previous job? IMHO, it does not matter what the title is. As long as the job description is the same, you should be OK.
I had "part time Oracle developer" in the LC but the letter I got just said "Oracle developer" and mentioned that is was part time (20 hrs/ wk). I don't think it is such a big deal.
What did your lawyer say?
more...
dealsnet
11-16 10:28 AM
See a lawyer. He can find out the better job description for you.
He need to file LCA according to these job title.
Consult a reputed lawyer.
I'm on my OPT, basically student F1 visa.
The thing is the company where I work is ready to sponsor me. They only don't know which occupation to write for me in order to be eligible for H1B.
I'm working over there on administrative position and doing various accounting things.
Thanks
He need to file LCA according to these job title.
Consult a reputed lawyer.
I'm on my OPT, basically student F1 visa.
The thing is the company where I work is ready to sponsor me. They only don't know which occupation to write for me in order to be eligible for H1B.
I'm working over there on administrative position and doing various accounting things.
Thanks
hair gold stars on lack
srn04
01-19 09:19 AM
1.) Is it true that nurses do not need to undergo Labor Certification when applying for an immigrant visa because nurses are considered as shortage occupations? How does the labor certification process for nurses vs other professionals/workers differ? Is it the pre-certification and recruiting process (that does have to be completed) under PERM?
2.) If a nurse on H1B visa is petitioned by her current employer for green card, which is preferable (in terms of better chances of being approved, easier processing, lesser requirements): to petition her using the same position (specialty occupation), or as a staff nurse?
2.) If a nurse on H1B visa is petitioned by her current employer for green card, which is preferable (in terms of better chances of being approved, easier processing, lesser requirements): to petition her using the same position (specialty occupation), or as a staff nurse?
more...
thesparky007
04-22 09:39 PM
looks cool
and funny
and funny
hot For colors i want the star to
anna20
02-05 06:47 PM
Thanks amitjoey .
I140 is already approved Was just waiting for 180 days to finish . So in this time of recession waiting for employer to find a project(corp to corp) or should i accept the offer and wait till i get the EAD to start work .
I140 is already approved Was just waiting for 180 days to finish . So in this time of recession waiting for employer to find a project(corp to corp) or should i accept the offer and wait till i get the EAD to start work .
more...
house has gold stars on a lack
priderock
08-02 04:57 PM
Similar case. My lawyer told me that we can't apply the second I140 under premium because the original labor is gone with the first I140. So, I could not wait for second I140 and went ahead and filed for 485 under EB3.
tattoo Black background with a
frostrated
10-26 02:10 PM
All,
I am currently unemployed and my spouse needs to travel to Mumbai urgently. Our AP is valid through November 30, 2009. Will there be any issues for my wife when she comes back - possibly because of my current status. Wife is employed (with a different company)& the EAD/AP was filed by my last employer. Responses will be appreciated. Thanks!
an EAD requires a sponsoring company. So, it is in your best interest to find an employer immediately and apply for AC21. If at the time of renewal they ask for employer documents, then your renewal will not be processed and your EAD/AP withdrawn.
I am currently unemployed and my spouse needs to travel to Mumbai urgently. Our AP is valid through November 30, 2009. Will there be any issues for my wife when she comes back - possibly because of my current status. Wife is employed (with a different company)& the EAD/AP was filed by my last employer. Responses will be appreciated. Thanks!
an EAD requires a sponsoring company. So, it is in your best interest to find an employer immediately and apply for AC21. If at the time of renewal they ask for employer documents, then your renewal will not be processed and your EAD/AP withdrawn.
more...
pictures Black background with a
archanais
07-19 07:43 PM
I am in a worst scenario , just changed a job couple of months ago. I have labor and I-140 approved from Company A. I have even paid $6000 to company A to sponsor my GC and $5500 for a visa transfer. After joining company B i didn't start labor again. Begging Company A to give an employement letter , they have even cancelled my H1b visa so I can't join them back unless i pay H1b visa transfer fee and a pay-cut. Wondering if it is even worth it ?
Planning to inform this to DOL and USCIS , how employers can be sooo greedy
Planning to inform this to DOL and USCIS , how employers can be sooo greedy
dresses These Walk of Fame Star
tslee
04-22 12:14 PM
Dear all:
May I ask what I should do in the following situation?
I hold F1 visa and my new job starts on Sept 1. The int'l student office of my current university mistakenly set my OPT start date on May 6. My OPT has been approved and EAD card arrived.
That is, I will have 120-plus "unemployment" days accumulated by early August, which will then violate the "90-day unemployment rule" of OPT.
I am under tremendous pressure and really want to hear your opinions.
Many thanks in advance!
May I ask what I should do in the following situation?
I hold F1 visa and my new job starts on Sept 1. The int'l student office of my current university mistakenly set my OPT start date on May 6. My OPT has been approved and EAD card arrived.
That is, I will have 120-plus "unemployment" days accumulated by early August, which will then violate the "90-day unemployment rule" of OPT.
I am under tremendous pressure and really want to hear your opinions.
Many thanks in advance!
more...
makeup The design features a BLACK
ch102
02-22 08:43 AM
Over 500 Indian guest workers sue US company for human trafficking - The Times of India (http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/nri/news/Over-500-Indian-guest-workers-sue-US-company-for-human-trafficking/articleshow/7548222.cms)
HOUSTON: Lawyers for a group of Indian guest workers, trafficked to the US from India to work in shipyards after Hurricane Katrina in 2005, have sued an American company, Signal International, along with its co-conspirators and other entities for human trafficking and racketeering.
If class status is granted, the lawsuit could be the largest human trafficking case in US history, the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) has said in a statement.
Workers were allegedly lured here with dishonest assurances of becoming lawful permanent US residents, the statement said.
The ACLU joined a class action lawsuit brought on behalf of over 500 guest workers from India charging that the workers were trafficked into the US through the federal government's H-2B guest worker programme with dishonest assurances of becoming lawful permanent US residents and subjected to squalid living conditions, fraudulent payment practises, and threats of serious harm upon their arrival.
The complaint alleges that recruiting agents hired by the marine industry company Signal International held the guest workers' passports and visas, coerced them into paying extraordinary fees for recruitment, immigration processing and travel, and threatened the workers with serious legal and physical harm if they did not work under the Signal-restricted guest worker visa.
The complaint also alleges that once in the US, the men were required to live in Signal's guarded, over crowded labour camps, subjected to psychological abuse and defrauded out of adequate payment for their work.
The ACLU charges that the federal government has fallen short of its responsibility to protect the rights of guest workers in this country.
According to the lawsuit, the treatment of the workers violates the Victims of Trafficking and Violence Protection Act (TVPA) and the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organisations Act (RICO).
In addition to the federal court litigation, in partnership with the ACLU, the workers have testified before the UN special rapporteur on the human rights of migrants, the UN special rapporteur on contemporary forms of racism, racial discrimination, xenophobia and related intolerance, and senior staff at the UN Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights.
Signal, a marine and fabrication company with shipyards in Mississippi, Texas and Alabama, is a subcontractor for several major multinational companies.
HOUSTON: Lawyers for a group of Indian guest workers, trafficked to the US from India to work in shipyards after Hurricane Katrina in 2005, have sued an American company, Signal International, along with its co-conspirators and other entities for human trafficking and racketeering.
If class status is granted, the lawsuit could be the largest human trafficking case in US history, the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) has said in a statement.
Workers were allegedly lured here with dishonest assurances of becoming lawful permanent US residents, the statement said.
The ACLU joined a class action lawsuit brought on behalf of over 500 guest workers from India charging that the workers were trafficked into the US through the federal government's H-2B guest worker programme with dishonest assurances of becoming lawful permanent US residents and subjected to squalid living conditions, fraudulent payment practises, and threats of serious harm upon their arrival.
The complaint alleges that recruiting agents hired by the marine industry company Signal International held the guest workers' passports and visas, coerced them into paying extraordinary fees for recruitment, immigration processing and travel, and threatened the workers with serious legal and physical harm if they did not work under the Signal-restricted guest worker visa.
The complaint also alleges that once in the US, the men were required to live in Signal's guarded, over crowded labour camps, subjected to psychological abuse and defrauded out of adequate payment for their work.
The ACLU charges that the federal government has fallen short of its responsibility to protect the rights of guest workers in this country.
According to the lawsuit, the treatment of the workers violates the Victims of Trafficking and Violence Protection Act (TVPA) and the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organisations Act (RICO).
In addition to the federal court litigation, in partnership with the ACLU, the workers have testified before the UN special rapporteur on the human rights of migrants, the UN special rapporteur on contemporary forms of racism, racial discrimination, xenophobia and related intolerance, and senior staff at the UN Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights.
Signal, a marine and fabrication company with shipyards in Mississippi, Texas and Alabama, is a subcontractor for several major multinational companies.
girlfriend Our Large Walk of Fame Star
b3mus3d
11-15 02:34 PM
Love em :love::thumb:
;)Thanks! Hopefully it'll get added to the main page soon.
I've realised how 'old' the whole stamp thing is on Kirupa now, so I'll be visiting the other boards :D
;)Thanks! Hopefully it'll get added to the main page soon.
I've realised how 'old' the whole stamp thing is on Kirupa now, so I'll be visiting the other boards :D
hairstyles ackground and gold stars
rtaqi
07-25 07:30 AM
There shouldn't be any issues. The H1 visa stamp on your passport is seperate from the I-797 approval that you received, both are valid. Your wife should also have no problems getting an H4 using your current I-797. I had a freind recently who was in the exact same situation and he and his wife both didn't have any issues.
akizdetz
08-10 07:33 PM
USCIS is just fooling with you. :D you are an eastern European, right?
Hahaha, you're so funny! I guess you're the smart one from this forum, who thinks everybody loves your jokes! Grow up and get a job!
Hahaha, you're so funny! I guess you're the smart one from this forum, who thinks everybody loves your jokes! Grow up and get a job!
gc28262
08-16 01:10 PM
The court concluded that the Memorandum does not constitute final agency action subject to judicial review and the notice and comment requirements under the APA. The court concluded that the Memorandum establishes interpretive guidelines for the implementation of 8 C.F.R. � 214.2 and does not bind USCIS adjudicators in their determination of plaintiff’s H-1B visa applications.
Does this mean this memo is not legally binding to USCIS adjudicators ?
Is it a victory in disguise for plaintiffs ?
If I remember correctly, the lawsuit was that USCIS did not follow proper rule making procedures.
Court says rule making need not be followed as this memo is not legally binding.
Does this mean this memo is not legally binding to USCIS adjudicators ?
Is it a victory in disguise for plaintiffs ?
If I remember correctly, the lawsuit was that USCIS did not follow proper rule making procedures.
Court says rule making need not be followed as this memo is not legally binding.
Niciun comentariu:
Trimiteți un comentariu